I’ve gotten this question so many times it’s truly unbelievable. “Aren’t we meant to eat meat?” There are a few different responses that I give to people and they are always shocked. None of my responses should be in anyway controversial, in reality, they are all facts, but people continue to look at me like I have three heads. I suppose this reaction is normal since I’m mentioning an idea that people have never heard of—kind of when we were told the truth about Santa and the Tooth fairy. At any rate, I hope this post will show you another side to this question.
To get to the answer of this question, dwelling on the past is not the answer. Many people bring up our ancestry, but since we are not living in caves, it is not relevant. While our ancestors needed to use meat for their survival, we by no means have to, in fact, quite the opposite is true. They walked places, we drive cars. They hunted, we factory farm. The times are totally different so let’s get to the point.
Currently, there are two main types of diets—animal based and vegetarian. When we look at the hard numbers of these diets, the consensus is clear as to which one is better for our health. I could go on and on with statistics, and I will mention a few, but if you are truly interested, I encourage you to search the internet, read the china study, or talk with a dietitian-- they will all confirm that there is a strong link between the consumption of meat and diseases.
As mentioned above, I will cover one or two studies just to put everything into perspective. The first covers heart disease. Heart disease is the number one cause of death in America according to the American Heart Association. One study found that people who eat meat have a 50% higher risk of developing heart disease compared to vegetarians.[i] Next, cancer rates, found in numerous studies, are also affected by the consumption of meat. One 11-year-long German study (with 800 vegetarian men), found their cancer rates were less than half those of the general public. Another study shows vegetarians having 40% the cancer rates of meat-eaters.[ii] And just to bring everything together, according to the American Dietetic Association, vegetarians have “lower rates of death from ischemic heart disease; … lower blood cholesterol levels, lower blood pressure, and lower rates of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and prostate and colon cancer.[iii]” To think we thought smoking in front of our kids is bad, maybe it’s time we stop killing them with the food we give them—eating meat is the new cigarette.( and better yet, we have to note that these studies came out before our meat is genetically modified.)
When we get back to the question above, “Aren’t we meant to eat meat?” the previous studies and nearly all mainstream nutritional science are important to note. If we are meant to eat meat, why are the health problems mentioned above drastically lower in vegetarians? The answer is clear—we aren’t meant to eat meat.
There has also been some study of our anatomy by a Stanford University-trained physician specializing in nutrition named Dr. Milton R. Mills. In his paper, The Comparative Anatomy of Eating, Dr. Mills breaks down our body organ by organ and shows why the body of humans is better equipped for a vegetarian diet. He compares our organs to Carnivores, Herbivores, and Omnivores and shows us which we are most like. For those who are scientifically inclined, I encourage you to take a quick look at it.
In the paper he talks about a number of troubling facts if you still maintain that we are meant to eat meat. For one, he talks about the common misconception of our teeth. Many people talk about our canine teeth as a reason for why we are meant to eat meat. Comparing our canine teeth to a true carnivore such as a cat’s teeth is laughable. When we eat foods, we use the molars in the back to chew, like herbivores, not our canine teeth. Take note of this next time you eat. If we were to remove our canines, we wouldn’t even notice the difference. We also must chew our food in order for proper digestion. Carnivores can swallow their food whole (think of a lion or tiger after a kill).
The next organ he talks about is the size of our intestines. In summary, carnivore’s intestines are very short while herbivores are long. Ours, as I’m sure many already know, are quite long. This is one of the reasons we hear so much about fiber; while carnivores don’t need fiber because of their relatively short intestines, herbivores and humans do for proper digestion. This is another area where our ’natural’ diets of meat have failed us. For those who have ever been constipated, you already know why meat-based diets are inadequate.
Lastly, though not mentioned in the paper, there is the issue of cholesterol. While true carnivores can have literally unlimited amounts of cholesterol and not have any effect on their heart and artery walls, we hear about how high cholesterol is such a problem in humans every day. We are not meant to have diets with high cholesterol, which is only found in animal products. This is one of the reasons for such high rates of Heart Disease.
The paper discusses 16 other attributes throughout our body which show why we are not ‘meant’ to eat meat. As discussed in the paper, we are traditionally though of as omnivores, however an overwhelming amount of our anatomy proves otherwise. Similar to the disease rates mentioned above, I encourage everyone to read elsewhere to learn about our anatomy to assure you that I am not exaggerating or fabricating any information.
The last point I would like to bring up is the point of nutrition since this is brought up nearly every dinner conversation. The idea that plants don’t have protein, vitamins and minerals is ludicrous. In a NYTimes article, Mark Bittman brings up the point that, “Plants have protein, too; in fact, per calorie, many plants have more protein than meat.”[iv] I suppose the next time someone asks where I get my protein, I should say, “Vegetables, but you eat meat, are you sure you’re getting enough protein?” The other side to the wacky argument deals with not having enough vitamins and minerals. Why do you think dietitions stress eating more fruits and vegetables? Could it be that vegetables have a variety of vitamins, minerals, and fiber which meat doesn't have? Yes.(and if people were truly worried, I don't see anything wrong with taking a multi-vitamin which some meat-eaters are already do. Also, before this comes up, by eating a variety, you can get all of the essential amino acids.)
Science, nutrition, and epidemiology have shown us that we are not meant to eat meat and if anything, to avoid it completely. Society continues to have this crazy misconception that we are somehow meant to eat meat. This cannot be farther from the truth. People do not salivate when they see road kill, which carnivores do. People cannot kill pray with our nails or teeth like carnivores do. And most importantly, if humans were meant to be carnivores, we certainly would not have the crazy health problems that we see in meat eaters. Until all of these change, I am convinced we are not meant to eat meat and I hope you are too. The idea that we would rather kill animals for the taste which will result in an increase in disease as opposed to switch our diet to a humane one is nonsensical and outrageous. It’s time we look at our diet and do what is the right thing. It’s time we stopped eating meat.
[i] Elizabeth Somer, "Eating Meat: A Little Doesn't Hurt," WebMD, 1999.
[ii] Neal Barnard, M.D., The Power of Your Plate, Book Publishing Co.: Summertown, Tenn., 1990, p. 26.
[iii] Ann Mangels, Virginia Messina, and Vesanto Melina, "Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada: Vegetarian Diets," Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Jun. 2003, pp. 748-65.
[iv] http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/11/dining/11mini.html
Garbage as Property
1 week ago
13 comments:
You write very well. And I'm really enjoying reading your posts.
I think, though, that mentioning that these studies were done before animals were genetically modified is irrelevant. I generally hate the hype that people have made about GMO's. Maybe I don't know enough about it, but I think it takes credibility away from our arguments. Through selective breeding, less animals now are needed for milk production than back in the "olden days". But selective breeding isn't exactly genetic modification, so I'm curious as to what you mean. Do you mean cloning and the like?
I just think that there are better arguments to use. Stay away from the genetic modification/growth hormones/blah blah blah etc are evil arguments. There are better ones.
I also, unfortunately, tend to think that humans are herbivores argument is a bit weak as well. Whenever comparing humans to carnivores, we obviously fail. But very rarely are we seriously compared to omnivores like pigs. We are not meant to eat mass amounts of meat and other animal products, this is beyond obvious. But if someone were to eat a tiny bit of animal protein here and there it wouldn't be unhealthy.
However, someone can be just as healthy on a vegan diet, and eat no meat. This is why I think the ethical argument is the strongest. If you can have the same level of health and vigor on a cruelty-free diet, there's no excuse to go on consuming products of suffering and death.
Just a few random comments! (By the way, this is Ashley. ;))
Michael Pollan's Omnivore's Dilemma is a good book to use as a source for the process of raising cows, chickens, etc for slaughter. The descriptions of the farms are enough to put anyone off their meat "chow" forever. Also, Mark Bitner has a story in the NY Times which shows the fishing industry for what it is. Again, big fish farms using most of the fresh fish kill to feed the fish at the farms. Hope you will be one of our leaders in how to eat healthier, farm wisely, and yearn for more knowledge.
This is a great blog, and I agree with the clarifications in the comments. Just this afternoon, I had a girl ask me these very questions.
Just thinking about the rest of the world in regards to this...
In Asia, species and forests are declining 1000 times faster than ever before. Much of the species removal is due to poaching, because people are starving in these rural countries. Now how could vegetarianism/veganism help here? I worry that people may be caught in an American vacuum, considering only the bounty of fresh produce and other supplementary diet options (ex. nutritional yeast or mock duck) available in our grocery stores. I'm not trying to be a smart alec, but I do want to know your opinions/facts on this.
This is really the knowledge where I want to expend my energy when I go to college next year, and I'd like to start thinking about how sustainability can apply to resources for all, especially those in impoverished or underdeveloped countries.
Thanks!
-Magdalen, queen of tofurkey making and birthday girl as of today!
This is like telling Smokers, smoking is bad for their health. They don't care about it and if they do, they will pretend they don't smoke THAT much. Some will also go in the shocking direction to claim that it is beneficial(a stress reliever).
Meat eaters do the same. Eating meat is a public health concern, yet they claim that they don't eat THAT much or even so far to say that we need meat! I guess it goes to show how ignorant people can be when they are in the wrong. Smokers look stupid. Meat eaters look stupid. No other way around it.
Nevertheless, great blog! I'll keep coming back for updates!
am an all loving person, i am a vegan by heart(beacuse i care and understand not because i fear god or fear i may become food myself) god is a clever bitch, i beleive god made meat consumable for human, mainly to test the human heart, or divide the the evil(insane) and good(sane)that life has made of us.
I beleive the animal that are killed for food are use to septerrate the good and the bad and they are just a computer acting out as real living animal.
also i beleive the homeless and people suffering around the world, they are computer simulation acting as real human living being in pain or suffering.
it all for the reason for god to place us in a place that suit us best after we die,
example, if u love eveything and can be at peace with eveything, then heaven is made for you.
and for the people who can not kill what they love and kill what they dont love then, they will see a downsized heaven after they die, meaning they wont see what they dont love(people they hate, animal they eat etc.)
Thank you for this interesting article.
You are full of crap! People and their agendas that they no nothing about really puzzle me. Stop spreading B.S.! All you have to do is look at the human stomach and the enzymes we use to break down food. We are not made to be vegetarians. Just love the animals and stop spreading lies.
Clint, you are the one that knows nothing about the subject. Fats aren't even broken down in the stomach. They are broken down in the small intestine. And this causes a problem in itself. Carnivores have an extremely short intestinal tract so the meat can pass through quickly without staying in there for a long time. Humans have an extremely long intestinal tract, which is great for digesting the fibrous cell wall of plants, but bad for eating meat. It spends lots of time there and can rot and spread disease. Also, we don't have the right enzymes to digest meat. That is why we are the only creatures that eat meat that need to cook it. Everything thing else has an extremely acidic stomach which kills all the bacteria on the meat. Everything about the way we are made up proves that we SHOULDN'T eat meat. So please get your facts straight before posting hate comments.
Love your work! Thanks for giving strength and inspiration to those struggling with vegetarianism. Brilliant use of stats too (on the death counter!)
Great article! I wanted to get the counter you have on this page but the link does not work anymore. Where can I get it?
According to a 1999 article in the journal The Ecologist, several of our physiological features "clearly indicate a design" for eating meat, including "our stomach's production of hydrochloric acid, something not found in herbivores. Furthermore, the human pancreas manufactures a full range of digestive enzymes to handle a wide variety of foods, both animal and vegetable.
"While humans may have longer intestines than animal carnivores, they are not as long as herbivores'; nor do we possess multiple stomachs like many herbivores, nor do we chew cud," the magazine adds. "Our physiology definitely indicates a mixed feeder."
If people were designed to be strict vegetarians, McArdle expects we would have a specialized colon, specialized teeth and a stomach that doesn't have a generalized pH-all the better to handle roughage. Tom Billings, a vegetarian for three decades and site editor of BeyondVeg.com, believes humans are natural omnivores. Helping prove it, he says, is the fact that people have a low synthesis rate of the fatty acid DHA and of taurine, suggesting our early ancestors relied on animal foods to get these nutrients. Vitamin B-12, also, isn't reliably found in plants. That, Billings says, left "animal foods as the reliable source during evolution."
That article is complete BS. Yes we are designed to eat both meat and plants. Your logic and article is flawed!! Meat is healthy for us over-eating or cooking food in an unhealthy form is bad!! Screw your article its scientific facts from actual scientists not vegan wannabe's that has proven it healthy and they we are designed for meat consumption
Humans can digest both plants (raw as well cooked) / animals (only if cooked properly). It depend upon person to take the easy path or the difficult path. Eating meat is beneficial if taken in very less quantity like eating a chicken in 2/3 month or a fish (normal ) in one month. The problem is people are so stupid that they have included meat in all meals. In old time, people use to eat meat on few occasion as it was not affordable. But this days (thanks to butcher industry) meat is cheap and so do diseases with them. These days animals are kept in bad conditions and are neglected and are feed with special diet to grow them fast and sometime even geneticaly mutated to be more fat. (if you still want to eat them go eat, who cares). If you really care about your health than eat meat/fish in moderate and being a vegetarian is definitely better for planet and animals. Think if there is some alien who can survive by eating us :D [Stupid argument I know but it justify that killing someone's kid/mother just to feed our kids is not good :( ] If an animal start eating humans we kill it ? why ? give them also fare chance ? We have brains but use it to eat meat in moderate, to save planet/ animals and also your health.... not to justify eating large amount of meat. One question to hard core meat eater. When you see cats run over by car why don't you feel like bringing it to home and cook ?? Also, please visit butcher house to see how animals are killed and what pain they feel. I can bet 80% people will stop eating meat. Go visit vegetable farms, almost no one will stop eating fruits WHY ??? Which thing you will like to see tree with fruits or animal killed whose blood is oozing out of body and crying with pain?? This will tell what we are made for... closing with a BAANGGG.. You can argue but you can't hide human program stored in us by centuries of programing by ancestors...
Post a Comment